Since the Paris Agreement is expected to apply after 2020, the first formal inventory of the agreement will not be carried out until 2023. However, as part of a decision attached to the agreement, the parties decided to restart the five-year cycle with a „facilitation dialogue“ on collective progress in 2018 and the presentation of the NDC by 2030 to 2020. Yes, yes. The agreement is considered a „treaty“ in international law, but only certain provisions are legally binding. The question of what provisions should be made mandatory was a central concern of many countries, particularly the United States, which wanted an agreement that the President could accept without the approval of Congress. The completion of this test excluded binding emissions targets and new binding financial commitments. However, the agreement contains binding procedural obligations, such as the requirements for the maintenance of successive NPNSPs and consideration of progress in their implementation. The Paris Agreement provides a sustainable framework that guides global efforts for decades to come. The aim is to create a continuous cycle that prevents countries from increasing their ambitions over time.

In order to encourage increased ambitions, the agreement defines two interconnected processes, each with a five-year cycle. The first is a „comprehensive state of affairs“ to assess the collective progress made in achieving the long-term goals of the agreement. The parties will then submit new NDCs „informed of the results of the global inventory.“ Developed countries have committed, under the UNFCCC, to support containment and adaptation efforts in developing countries. Under the Copenhagen and Cancun agreements, developed countries have pledged to mobilize $100 billion in public and private financing per year for developing countries by 2020. As explained in this C2ES edition letter, the participation of the United States in the Paris Agreement can only be decided by the President, without, among other things, seeking the Council and the approval of the Senate, because of the establishment of an existing treaty, the United Nations Convention on Climate Change. If Biden is president, he would have enough authority to join it as an „executive convention.“ Negotiations on the Paris regulatory framework at COP 24 proved to some extent to be more difficult than those that led to the Paris Agreement, as the parties faced a range of technical and political challenges and, in some respects, applied more to the development of the general provisions of the agreement through detailed guidelines.